MirandaMirandaHowever, the future of the rule announced by the court in In the Interest of R.H. is questionable, since only two justices signed their names to it.
February 22, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
In a deeply divided decision handed down on Friday, the state Supreme Court has established a per se rule that a student is entitled to receive Miranda warnings before being questioned by a school police officer on school grounds.
However, the future of the rule announced by the court in In the Interest of R.H.is questionable, since only two justices signed their names to it.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
