Before the end of its current term, the U.S. Supreme Court will issue its next decision concerning the Takings Clause, a subject that has previously sharply divided the Court and that has been followed closely by New Jersey land-use and environmental lawyers.

In contrast to last year’s Palazzolo v. Rhode Islandruling that involved a permanent taking, the pending case, Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, et al. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, et al., involves whether a development moratorium resulted in a temporary taking. 533 U.S. 606 (2001); 216 F.3d 764, reh. en banc den. 228 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2000), cert. granted 533 U.S. 948 (2001).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]