Matrimonial lawyers are in a quandary over an appellate ruling that spurns a traditional method of property valuation in divorce cases. A three-judge panel held on Feb. 28 that a court evaluating a spouse`s interest in a closely held corporation should not discount stock value to reflect minority-shareholder status and low marketability, except in extraordinary circumstances.
March 15, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
Matrimonial lawyers are in a quandary over an appellate ruling that spurns a traditional method of property valuation in divorce cases.
A three-judge panel held on Feb. 28 that a court evaluating a spouse’s interest in a closely held corporation should not discount stock value to reflect minority-shareholder status and low marketability, except in extraordinary circumstances.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
