While the issue decided in Tahoe-Sierrawas simply that a 32-month development moratorium did not constitute a per se compensable taking, the case will likely have far broader implications because it provided the U.S. Supreme Court with the opportunity to clarify a number of its earlier takings decisions and allowed the Court to reveal how it is likely to approach some of the unresolved issues in this area.

The Court’s ruling on April 23, 2002, in Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency,2002 WL 654431 (2002), dealt a significant blow to property-rights advocates, but debate will not likely end here.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]