The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday scratched the surface of the looming battle over state taxation of Internet retailers and seemed troubled by what it saw.

The justices heard arguments in Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl, a jurisdictional dispute over a Colorado law that seeks to capture new revenue by requiring out-of-state companies to report information to the state about their sales to Colorado residents.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]