With the misguided goal of helping their employer and the aid of language barriers, local hires may endeavor to bridge the gap between a multinational company’s restrictive code of conduct and the inappropriate expectations of local officials by, for example, recording bribe payments as something that is more palatable to the company.
As more companies emphasize the importance of antibribery compliance, some local employees understand that it is an important corporate goal, but still believe in error that covering up instances will help to achieve that goal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
