Citing an "abject failure to make proper discovery," a Singapore appeals court has thrown out a decision favoring a bank over an individual investor in a dispute over $5 million in losses incurred during the global financial crisis from the purchase of a type of structured financial product called an accumulator.
May 24, 2013 at 02:25 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Citing an "abject failure to make proper discovery," a Singapore appeals court has thrown out a decision favoring a bank over an individual investor in a dispute over $5 million in losses incurred during the global financial crisis.
Teo Wai Cheong had been an investor in a type of structured financial product called an accumulator, which he purchased through a private banker at the Singapore arm of French bank Credit Industriel et Commercial (CIC).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
