The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has ruled that plaintiffs injured in a 1997 Hamas terrorist attack in Jerusalem can't attach Iranian antiquities at Boston-area museums to fulfill a judgment award against the Republic of Iran. The court held that the antiquities are not "blocked assets" under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002.
March 05, 2013 at 06:46 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A federal appeals court has ruled that plaintiffs injured in a 1997 Hamas terrorist attack in Jerusalem can’t attach Iranian antiquities at Boston-area museums to fulfill a judgment award against the Republic of Iran.
On February 27, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a ruling by George O’Toole Jr. of the District of Massachusetts dissolving attachments of the property.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
