X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
New York Law School on Oct. 13 filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by three former students who claimed the school inflated its post-graduate employment rates and salary data in order to lure students. In its motion, the law school argued that the plaintiffs haven’t backed up their claims and that they are focusing on much larger issues in legal education than anything specific to the school. “The allegations are not only baseless, but also belied by the plaintiffs’ own complaint, which demonstrates this case has nothing to do with New York Law School and everything to do with a crusade against the entire law school industry,” said Venable partner Michael Volpe, who represents the school. The motion argued that the job data published by the school complied with American Bar Association rules, and that the plaintiffs have not established a link between the reported job statistics and any alleged harm. It said that two of the three plaintiffs are in fact working in law-related jobs, and that all three decided to attend New York Law School before the publication of the allegedly misleading jobs data. Attorney Jeffery Strauss, who with David Anziska represents the plaintiffs, said on Oct. 14 that the motion to dismiss did not address the crux of the suit, which was filed in August. “We are still digesting [the motion to dismiss], but the fact remains that when our clients paid their $40,000 to attend New York Law School, they did so based on New York Law School’s misleading representations that they had an over 90% chance of getting a job and that those jobs paid certain salaries,” Strauss said. “That representation is demonstrably false. Their motion fails to address that basic fact.” The plaintiffs seek class status, tuition refunds and additional remedies. Strauss and Anziska have filed a nearly identical suit against the Thomas M. Cooley Law School on behalf of its graduates. Cooley’s lawyers were expected to file their response by Oct. 21. New York Law School’s response was similar to that offered by the Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, which was sued by a graduate in May. Earlier this month, Strauss and Anziska said they were seeking plaintiffs for class actions against an additional 15 law schools, and predicted that nearly every law school in the country will have been sued by the end on 2012. Karen Sloan can be contacted at [email protected].

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.