A Manhattan federal magistrate judge has recommended against narrowing class allegations in a gender discrimination suit against Goldman Sachs & Co., rejecting the bank’s argument that allegations premised on a charge filed by one of the named plaintiffs, Christina Chen-Oster, with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission must be stricken because the charge contained facts specific only to her.

Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV issued a report and recommendation on Sept. 29 holding that Southern District Judge Leonard B. Sand should deny the bank’s motion to strike the class allegations, finding that Ms. Chen-Oster’s charge had put the EEOC on notice that she believed there was a pattern of discrimination against women at Goldman. That notice was enough to satisfy the administrative remedy exhaustion requirement for bringing a federal class action, even though the EEOC did not investigate the class allegations, the magistrate judge said.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]