A string of 18 text messages in three hours from one divorced parent to the other does not necessarily amount to harassment, a state appeals court says in reversing a final restraining order.
August 22, 2011 at 06:11 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
Excessive texting from one divorced parent to the other does not necessarily amount to harassment, a state appeals court said Monday in a published decision reversing a final restraining order.
The husband’s sending of 18 angry messages in the space of three hours “shows only the convergence of modern technology and the foibles of human judgment,” the Appellate Division held in L.M.F. v. J.A.F., A-121-10.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
