SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals today refused to sanction a revenue-sharing deal that Southern California grocery chains made in anticipation of a labor-related strike. But the court stopped just short of outlawing the practice.

A divided en banc panel said it would not expand the law of nonstatutory labor exemption to shield grocers from antitrust liability, but that it would need more information to determine if the agreement had a significant anti-competitive impact before deeming it a Sherman Act violation.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]