Throwing cold water on one of the hottest areas of litigation in the past few years, a federal judge in Philadelphia has struck down as unconstitutional the qui tam provision of the Patent Act’s false marking statute, saying it improperly gives law enforcement authority to private individuals.

Under the law, citizens have the right to sue whenever a product is marketed as "patented" when, in fact, the patent has expired or never existed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]