Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Alternative fee arrangements are “in” again. Some say they are a temporary trend and the billable hour will reign supreme once the economy improves. It is more likely alternative billing is here to stay for two reasons. First, alternative fee arrangements never disappeared after they last were in vogue in the 1990s, but they did stop getting press because the biggest law firms were grabbing headlines by commanding top dollar for hourly billing. Second, today’s in-house counsel find a lot to like about alternative fee arrangements and will be reluctant to abandon them in the future.


Trust, fairness and transparency — if a fee proposal has these three features, it is likely to succeed. The attorney-client relationship requires a foundation built on trust. This is as true in the billing arena as it is when it comes to devising strategy regarding the merits of a case. Moreover, in any complex and ongoing business relationship, both sides must feel the deal is fair, or the relationship will not last. The key to building a fair and trusting relationship is transparency. A transparent billing relationship allows you and your client to see how fees are generated and risks are shared. In this scenario, neither party is likely to regret making the deal.

When structuring a fee arrangement for a new matter, the first and most important thing to do is determine what matters most to your client with respect to the particular case or transaction. Then, tie a risk and a reward to the client’s top priority. If the client cares most about prevailing on the merits, use some version of contingency billing to tie your reward to the result. On the other hand, if the client places the greatest value on getting an early settlement, tie your reward to that achievement by, for example, reducing a pre-set bonus every month the case remains unresolved. Or, if your client’s top priority is the efficient processing of a series of cases, tie the reward to keeping the average fees-per-matter within the client’s budget.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.