O’Melveny filed a lawsuit against MGA in July seeking $10.2 million in unpaid legal fees. The law firm had represented the toy company on several matters, most notably in a hard fought lawsuit against Mattel, Inc. over ownership of the Bratz doll line (O’Melveny ultimately was replaced by Skadden, Arps, Slate Meagher & Flom.). MGA responded to O’Melveny’s lawsuit with a cross-complaint that included several malpractice claims including overbilling, misrepresenting the qualifications of attorneys, and failing to secure expert witnesses.

MGA moved to stay the trial until after its lawsuit against Mattel, which is scheduled to be retried in January, was resolved. It argued that there is a strong nexus between the upcoming retrial involving the Bratz doll line and this lawsuit. O’Melveny opposed the stay, arguing that the case is a straightforward fee dispute that is unlikely to be impacted by the fight between Mattel and MGA.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]