By a 6-1 vote, the California Supreme Court has rejected much of San Francisco’s legal justification for the continuing use of minority preferences in public contracting.

Such preferences are banned under Proposition 209, and the justices on Monday said San Francisco was unlikely to establish that its program was compelled by federal law. The contracting provision in Prop 209 “prohibits race- and gender-conscious programs the federal equal protection clause permits but does not require,” explained Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]