A law firm facing a malpractice suit has lost its bid to seek indemnification from DLA Piper for any resulting damages in the case, which centers on work by a lawyer who practiced at both firms.

In a decision Tuesday, Manhattan Acting Supreme Court Justice Marcy Friedman ruled that DLA Piper was not required under contract or common law to contribute to any judgment in the case against Eaton & Van Winkle and the lawyer, Alfred Ferrer III.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]