The SEC’s suit against Goldman Sachs has people wondering whether other banks committed the same conduct with which the SEC has charged Goldman — that is, structuring piles of debt they secretly knew would fail and then pitching those piles of debt to investors.
Well, it turns out that Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan, representing a Dutch bank, alleged almost a year ago that Merrill Lynch did something similar in creating an investment fund nicknamed Norma. The Dutch client, Rabobank, sued Merrill in New York state trial court, and the Quinn team representing the bank filed papers last week in which they claimed the SEC’s charges against Goldman “bear directly” on Merrill’s conduct in the Norma matter, according to The Am Law Litigation Daily (paid registration required), one of our sibling publications. Playing the role of Paulson & Co. in the Merrill transaction: the hedge fund Magnetar Capital, which, Rabobank alleges, “cooperated” with Merrill in structuring the doomed investment fund and then bet against it. Rabobank claims Merrill falsely represented that an independent collateral manager picked the contents of Norma when, in reality, Magnetar had a major hand in those decisions. Magnetar has denied charges that it behaved in this way in the wake of a ProPublica story that alleged Magnetar structured deals designed to fail.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]