Newly armed with affidavits from 11 jurors, the Manhattan district attorney’s Office fired back at Anthony Marshall’s post-trial motion to set aside his conviction because the presiding judge refused to conduct an inquiry after the 12th juror complained she felt personally threatened by another juror.

The 11 jurors’ affidavits demonstrate that “no one was threatened in any way,” and the complaining juror, Judith DeMarco, “had nothing to point to that any reasonable person would have perceived as a threat,” Assistant District Attorney Joel J. Seidemann wrote in a 35-page brief (pdf) filed Friday.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]