A New Jersey appeals court on Wednesday reversed a trial judge who relied on his personal experience with canines in ruling that a dog that bit two people did not fall under the state Dangerous Dog Statute.

Camden County Superior Court Judge John McNeill failed to buttress his conclusion “with anything other than subjective opinion, bereft of factual support in the record,” the court held in State v. Taffet, A-3305-08.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]