Q: With the urging of my family, I accepted a position with a small law firm about a year ago based primarily on quality-of-life concerns. I had previously been working long hours as in-house corporate counsel for a large corporation and the position required a lot of travel. Now, a year later, it is increasingly obvious to me that I do not enjoy working in the small law firm environment. If I start to look for another in-house counsel position, how do I explain the decision to go to the firm? I assume that, when I say quality of life, the recruiter will hear I was feeling lazy.
Dear Greener Grass: You know, it is so interesting to me to receive your question … for so many years now I have been trying to tell my candidates that going in-house is not necessarily going to provide the quality-of-life change from law firm life that they think they are going to get. And here you are testifying to that very fact. No indeed, the grass certainly is not always greener on the other side of the fence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
