A federal judge has ruled that a New Jersey-based lawyer may move forward with her claim that New York law unconstitutionally discriminates against out-of-state lawyers by requiring them to maintain an office in New York if they want to practice law here.

Attorney Ekaterina Schoenefeld should be allowed to present arguments about whether New York’s office rule for out-of-state attorneys violates her rights under the privileges and immunities clause in Article IV, §2, of the U.S. Constitution because the state imposes no similar office-maintenance requirement on attorneys who are New York residents, Northern District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn ruled.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]