A pro se prisoner litigant is excused for failing to answer a motion for summary judgment because he was not given enough notice of procedural requirements by the court, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.

Reviving the lawsuit of Jose Hernandez against corrections officers who allegedly beat him, the circuit said Hernandez should have been informed by the judge of the consequences of converting a motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]