The New Jersey Supreme Court was asked last week to put a limit on a fired employee's ability to sue for discrimination based on the employer's post-discharge conduct. The justices heard an employer's appeal from a lower court ruling that allowed such a suit to go forward against a New Jersey food distributor, despite the fact that the alleged post-discharge misconduct was ultimately resolved in the plaintiffs' favor.
September 21, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The New Jersey Supreme Court last week was asked to put a limit on the ability of a fired employee to sue for discrimination based on the employer’s post-discharge conduct.
The justices heard an employer’s appeal from an Appellate Division ruling last year that allowed such suit to go forward against a Moonachie, N.J., food distributor, despite the fact that the alleged post-discharge misconduct was ultimately resolved in the plaintiffs’ favor.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
