In a ballot challenge case that has gone up and down to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court several times since 2006, the court has affirmed without opinion a Commonwealth Court ruling that the “Bonusgate” scandal does not affect an order requiring the candidate and his attorney pay more than $80,000 in attorney fees and costs.

The justices, in a two-sentence order, affirmed the Commonwealth Court decision and rejected a motion to hear oral argument on the matter.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]