Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Zafar Hasan, a former associate in Foley & Lardner‘s Chicago office, can proceed with an employment discrimination suit against the law firm, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in a ruling Tuesday that overturned a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Hasan, who is a Muslim of Indian descent, alleges in the 2004 lawsuit that certain partners at the law firm pushed to fire him on the basis of his race, religion, color and national origin after the Sept. 11 terrorist attack in New York. The firm first justified Hasan’s dismissal by saying his performance was poor, but later, after positive work evaluations turned up, said that the firm didn’t have enough work to keep him busy, according to a recap of the lawsuit in the 7th Circuit decision. The U.S. District Court granted summary judgment to the law firm, saying that Hasan hadn’t created a “convincing mosaic” of evidence of the discrimination that could permit a jury to agree that Foley had intentionally discriminated against Hasan, but the appellate court disagreed and said there was sufficient evidence. Hasan had been an associate in the business law department until he was asked in December 2002 to leave within six months because of “deficiencies in his performance.” “That ‘mosaic’ of evidence, together with the unresolved questions of fact, is sufficient under the direct method of proof for Mr. Hasan to survive summary judgment on his discrimination claims,” the Dec. 15 7th Circuit decision said. Seventh Circuit Judges John Coffey, Daniel Manion and Kenneth Ripple wrote the appellate decision that reversed U.S. District Court Judge James Zagel. Hasan’s attorney, Tom Crooks, said he was “very pleased” with the decision that expressed “exactly the theory we had put forth in our summary judgment response. Jackson Lewis partner Peter Bulmer, who is representing the law firm, couldn’t be reached for comment. Calls to the firm’s Chicago office weren’t immediately returned.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.