Endnotes:

1. Lipsky, David & Arcebor, “The Use of ADR in U.S. Corporations: Executive Summary” (1997) (survey conducted by Price Waterhouse and Cornell University’s PERC Institute on Conflict Resolution).

2. Elizabeth Hill, “Due Process at Low Cost: An Empirical Study of Employment Arbitration Under the Auspices of the American Arbitration Association,” 18 OHIO ST. J. ON DISP. RESOL. 777, 779-80 (2003).

3. JAMS – The International Resolution Experts, METROPOLITAN CORP. COUNSEL, August 2007, available at
http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&artMonth=August&art Year=2007&EntryNo=6990.

4. 532 U.S. 105 (2001).

5. 9 USC §§1 et seq. (2007).

6. Lubowiecki v. Ernst & Young, No. MID-L-2690-04, Transcript of Proceedings and Decision (N.J. Super. Ct. Aug. 4, 2004), aff’d by the New Jersey Appellate Division, A.2d, 2005 WL 3309785 (N.J. Super. A.D. Dec. 8, 2005), cert. denied, 186 N.J. 257, 893 A.2d 724 (2006).

7.
Nance v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., F.3d, 2008 WL 2151626 (6th Cir. May 23, 2008).

8. Employment Law 360, “Forced Arbitration Deals Can’t Be Too Broad: EEOC,” by Elaine Chow (quoting EEOC attorney John Hendrickson) (May 22, 2008).

9. Id.

10. Gentry v. Superior Court, 64 Cal. Rptr. 3d 773 (August 2007), cert. denied, 128 S.Ct. 1743 (March 2008).

11. EEOC v. Ralph’s Grocery Co., 07-5110 (N.D. Ill. May 8, 2008).