The New Jersey Supreme Court on July 1 ordered a new trial for a criminal defendant who was interrogated so sharply by the trial judge during his testimony that the jury may have questioned his veracity.
“[T]he questions had the effect of suggesting to the jury that the court doubted defendant’s account in a case that rested heavily on defendant’s credibility,” Chief Justice Stuart Rabner wrote for the unanimous court in State v. Taffaro (A-8-07). “Rather than clarify points in a witness’s testimony, the court’s questions had the capacity to signal disbelief.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
