Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A federal judge has thrown out a Brooklyn, N.Y., attorney’s pro se libel action against Judge Robert A. Katzmann of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Eastern District of New York Judge Dora L. Irizarry held that the supposedly defamatory statements Katzmann made in rejecting the plaintiff’s appeal in an employment discrimination case, which the plaintiff had likened to the judicial “equivalent of an assault,” were protected by the absolute immunity afforded to judicial acts. The decision marks the second time this year that Irizarry has dismissed a libel action filed by the plaintiff, Loretta McHenry, against a federal judge. Both suits stemmed from the plaintiff’s unsuccessful discrimination suit against her former employer, One Beacon Insurance. In January, Irizarry threw out McHenry’s case against Eastern District of New York Judge David G. Trager, the trial judge who rejected McHenry’s discrimination claim. Yesterday, Irizarry dismissed McHenry’s libel action against Katzmann, finding her claim in McHenry v. Katzmann, 08-cv-2249, to be “frivolous.” The details of the underlying case are sketchy, as neither Trager’s decision rejecting the lawyer’s employment discrimination claim nor Katzmann’s affirmance are available on Westlaw. According to Westlaw, the 2nd Circuit opinion was “deleted at the request of the Court.” Much can be gleaned about both decisions, however, from McHenry’s complaints, which are in parts identical. Both complaints rely heavily on broad, conclusory allegations and legally tangential details. In both complaints, for example, McHenry describes herself as “a 42 year old heterosexual white Irish Catholic female, single, never been married, with no children, 5’4 with short blonde colored hair, light skin and blue eyes.” Trager, she states, is a “tall heavy set white male in his late 60s early 70s with male pattern baldness”; Katzmann is a “white male born 1953, short medium skin, brown eyes and very dark short brown hair.” McHenry worked as a personal injury defense attorney from 1990 until 2003, when she was terminated by One Beacon Insurance for “negative and disruptive” behavior, according to her complaints. She then filed suit against One Beacon, alleging among other misdeeds sexual harassment and retaliation. In August 2005, Trager granted the defense summary judgment. In February 2007, Katzmann affirmed. In both cases, McHenry argued in her two suits, the judges defamed her. Trager, for example, “slanted the facts to find in the former employer’s favor contrary to the evidence and law. In the process he caused substantial harm to my reputation.” For his part, Katzmann “acted with malice aforethought to put the Federal Court ‘seal of approval’ on the false statements One Beacon submitted knowing that in Publishing his ‘conclusions’ Katzmann encouraged the repetition of false libel per se statements, giving free reign to all the Libel Per Se Statements made by One Beacon employees.” McHenry’s complaint extended to 22 pages, with more than a dozen other claims against Katzmann, all arising from his opinion. Irizarry dismissed the case sua sponte, citing judicial immunity. “Nothing in plaintiff’s complaint suggests that Judge Katzmann took nonjudicial actions against plaintiff or that his judicial actions were taken in the ‘complete absence of jurisdiction,’” Irizarry wrote. McHenry, a 1990 graduate of Brooklyn Law School, said she is considering moving to vacate or appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The decisions of Trager and Katzmann “weren’t good on the law, the precedent or the facts,” McHenry said. “If they were being just plain-old, good regular judges, I would have gotten a trial.” Varuni Nelson and Kenneth A. Stahl of the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York’s Office appeared on behalf of Trager and Katzmann, respectively. An office spokesman declined to comment.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.