Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

Cancel

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

Estate of Coll-Monge v. Inner Peace Movement

The D.C. Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded a decision of the district court granting summary judgment of noninfringement to the appellees in this trademark suit. The appellants, a deceased's estate and two for-profit corporations owned by the testator, sued the appellees, two nonprofit corporations that the deceased founded, for infringement of five trademarks. The district court found that the appellees were the sole users of the marks from the beginning and the sole owners of the marks and that the deceased registered the marks on their behalf, and that the "related companies" doctrine was inapplicable to nonprofit corporations. The court held that the district court erred in its related companies analysis and that there remained disputed issues of fact regarding both the doctrine's applicability in the case and the capacity in which the deceased registered the marks. The court upheld the district court's assessment against the estate of the cost of mailing "remedial notices" pursuant to a temporary restraining order issued before entering summary judgment.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Argued April 11, 2008

Before: HENDERSON, TATEL and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

The appellants, the Estate of Coll-Monge and two for-profit corporations owned by testator Francisco Coll, (collectively the Estate), brought this action for trademark infringement and related claims against two non-profit corporations that Coll founded-Inner Peace Movement, Inc. (IPM) and Peace Community Church (PCC) (jointly the Non-Profits). The Estate alleged that it is the sole registered owner of five marks Coll registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The Non-Profits-which use the marks-countered that they are the sole owners and that, when Coll registered the marks, he did so in his representative capacity on their behalf. The district court granted summary judgment to the Non-Profits on the trademark claims, concluding that on the undisputed facts they, as the sole users of the marks from the beginning, are also the sole owners and that Coll registered the marks on their behalf. In reaching its decision, the court held the “related companies” doctrine-under which registration of a mark used by a related company inures to the benefit of the owner- inapplicable to a non-profit corporation. We conclude that the district court erred in its “related companies” holding and that there remain disputed issues of fact regarding both the doctrine’s applicability here and the capacity in which Coll registered the marks with the USPTO. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s summary judgment on the Estate’s trademark claims and affirm the denial of the Estates’s partial summary judgment motion. On the other hand, we affirm the district court’s assessment against the Estate of the cost of mailing “remedial notices” pursuant to a temporary restraining order it issued before entering summary judgment.

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Team Accounts
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Bundle Subscriptions
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center
General Counsel Conference Southwest 2024
September 18, 2024 - September 19, 2024
Dallas, TX

Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies


Learn More
Women, Influence & Power in Law US Awards 2024
September 24, 2024
Chicago, IL

Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) 2024
September 23, 2024 - September 25, 2024
Chicago, IL

WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts
Associate Attorney

Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...


Apply Now ›
Plaintiff Personal Injury Attorney

Javerbaum Wurgaft, a large civil litigation firm with nine (9) offices, seeks: Plaintiff Personal Injury Attorney for Northern New Jersey of...


Apply Now ›
Litigation Attorneys - Cheshire-CT

Exciting Career Opportunities at Nuzzo & Roberts! Nuzzo & Roberts, a leading mid-sized insurance defense firm based in Cheshire, CT...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs