A divided Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has ruled that a Philadelphia restaurant violated its permit by providing an area on the premises where patrons could openly have sex with each other. In part, the panel majority turned a cold shoulder to the club owners' citing of a case in which off-track betting had been found under a state code to be an accessory use to a restaurant. Said one judge: "Currently, we are aware of no such legislation associating semi-public sexual activity with haute cuisine."
May 06, 2008 at 01:01 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A divided Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has ruled in favor of old-fashioned dining etiquette, ruling that sexual activity is not an accessory use to a restaurant.
The split seven-judge panel upheld a trial court’s ruling against Club Kama Sutra in Philadelphia.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
