Children Whose DNA Is Entered Into Ancestry.com Are Not Bound to Website's Arbitration Agreement, Rules Seventh Circuit
The court determined that Ancestry.com users' children were not express parties to the DNA processing consent terms.
February 16, 2024 at 05:59 PM
5 minute read
The Seventh Circuit concluded that children whose parents had activated DNA test kits for them on Ancestry.com were not bound to Ancestry's arbitration agreement, concluding the parents had not signed an agreement on behalf of the children.
Parents who activated DNA test kits on Ancestry.com for their children filed suit after another business acquired Ancestry, contending Ancestry violated their privacy rights by disclosing confidential genetic information. Ancestry moved to compel arbitration, arguing the DNA processing consent terms contain a dispute resolution provision which binds the parties to arbitration and waives any class actions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStanding Spat: Split 2nd Circuit Lets Challenge to Pfizer Diversity Program Proceed
Fight Over Amicus-Funding Disclosure Surfaces in Google Play Appeal
'Self-Diagnosed Nickel Allergy' Fails to Find Success in Med-Mal Suit, 8th Circuit Rules
5 minute readHow We Won: BraunHagey’s $56M Trademark Win Over Molson Coors Upheld by 9th Circuit
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-99
- 4Decision of the Day: NYPD Officer's Sexual Assault of Informant Occurred Outside Scope of Employment
- 5'Not the President's Personal Lawyer': Lawyers Share Concerns Over How AG Pick Bondi’s Loyalism to Trump May Impact DOJ