In Big Law, 'Flexibility' Is a Word for All Seasons: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 15, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
FLEX AND FLEXIBILITY - Law firms are taking advantage of their newly reestablished leverage over talent to haul folks back to the office for more days each week. But despite adopting attendance policies that are clearly more rigid than those that have been in place for the past three-plus years, many firms are still framing their office work arrangements as "flexible." So has the word simply lost all meaning or is "flexibility" in the eye of the beholder? Analysts told Law.com's Andrew Maloney that while there's probably no bright-line definition of the word in this context, it could also be an effort by firms to appeal to the broad range of workers under their mast, capturing as many of the benefits as possible while still seizing on momentum for more office time. Because the legal profession has had some level of tolerance for remote work for ages, too, any deviation from the pre-COVID norm of five days a week can technically be described as flexible, some observers noted.
ROBO COPS - Several major law firms have expressed concern that a proposed U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule seeking to restrict robo advisers' use of artificial intelligence is overbroad, Law.com's Marianna Wharry reports. The proposed rule aims to address conflicts of interest that occur when broker-dealer and investment advisers use predictive data analytics in investor interactions and would apply when a broker-dealer or investment adviser uses or foresees the use of "covered technology." But attorneys at Morgan Lewis and Sidley Austin have both penned client alerts cautioning that the proposed rule's required policies, procedures, evaluations and reviews, if adopted, would be burdensome and costly for legal departments.
ON THE RADAR - Gurinder Singh Grewal of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius has entered an appearance for City National Bank, a subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada, in a pending civil rights lawsuit over alleged race- and national origin-based discrimination. The complaint was filed June 27 in California Northern District Court by the Law Offices of Bonner & Bonner. The court action accuses the bank of a practice of 'redlining,' or denying loans to Black and Hispanic individuals. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin, is 3:23-cv-03195, Brown v. City National Bank. Stay up on the latest state and federal litigation, as well as the latest corporate deals, with Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
5 minute readBig Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Reality TV Couple and Pacific Palisades Neighbors Sue City of Los Angeles Over Loss of Homes to Fire
- 2Colgate Faces Class Actions Over ‘Deceptive Marketing’ of Children’s Toothpaste
- 3Inside Track: AI Is Sure to Fray Big Law's Devotion to Billable Hour
- 4Evidence Explained: Prevailing Attorney Outlines Successful Defense in Inmate Death Case
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 24: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250