The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has held that Hawaii’s ban on “butterfly knives” violates the Second Amendment, finding the pocketknife-esque blade falls under the definition of “arms.”

The Ninth Circuit reversed a district court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of Hawaii officials, holding that Hawaii’s ban on butterfly knives violates the Second Amendment as bladed weapons facially constitute “arms,” and at the time of the adoption of the amendment, “arms” generally extended to bladed weapons.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]