The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s determination that an online pet services platform wasn’t an employer and pet service providers on the platform weren’t “workers” under the Industrial Insurance Act.

In a June 6 opinion, Judge Bradley A. Maxa determined that pet service providers on A Place for Rover Inc., an online platform for pet services, weren’t working under an independent contractor and, therefore, the Superior Court hadn’t erred in reversing the Department of Labor and Industries’ order requiring Rover to pay an assessment of $219,947.75 in industrial insurance taxes and fines.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]