Finding an inspection company satisfied the three prongs of the so-called ABC test, the Massachusetts Court of Appeals overturned a lower court’s decision that independent home inspectors performing work on behalf of the company were eligible for unemployment benefits.
On Wednesday, the appellate court held that the employer, Tiger Home Inspection, met its burden to show that the inspectors are not employees under the meaning of the unemployment statute, G. L. c. 151A, according to a unanimous three-judge panel’s opinion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
