Two lawsuits on opposite sides of the United States—each alleging flaws in Snapchat’s Speed Filter—appear to be headed to the same place: in front of a jury.
Appellate courts in both Georgia and California have now rejected Snap Inc.’s defense of immunity under the Communications Decency Act. As a result, judges are taking a different view of lawsuits alleging the company made a dangerous product.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]