A federal judge drew a strong objection from the House’s top attorney Tuesday as he sent lawyers back to the negotiating table in a two-year subpoena fight over former President Donald Trump’s tax documents at Mazars.
During a status conference, held by videoconference, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta of the District of Columbia noted that the parties were able to have negotiations in a similar case in the Southern District of New York, over a subpoena to Deutsche Bank. He was apparently curious as to why those conversations were not taking place in the Mazars case, based in the D.C. trial court, where he was set to hear arguments Friday (the public line was not connected during the first 15 minutes of the virtual hearing, so the start of the proceedings couldn’t be heard).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]