Monsanto fired back at what it called “inflammatory rhetoric and mistaken assertions” that it paid a Roundup plaintiff to appeal a favorable ruling on federal preemption.
“These lawyers represent thousands of Roundup plaintiffs, and are evidently concerned that this court might decide the preemption issue in a way that could harm their other cases,” wrote Monsanto’s lawyer, Covington & Burling’s Michael Imbroscio, in an opposition filed Wednesday to a letter submitted last week in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit by lead plaintiffs counsel in the Roundup multidistrict litigation. “Non-parties do not have a veto right over another plaintiff’s litigation strategy because they would prefer, for their own self-interested reasons, that a federal court of appeals not decide an important question of federal law.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]