Since the U.S. Supreme Court began historic telephonic arguments in May, more than two dozen attorneys have made their arguments to the justices for the first time in cases ranging from a water fight between two states to LGBT discrimination in foster parenting to “faithless electors.”

Some of the debut advocates are veteran appellate lawyers such as Wiggin and Dana partner Jonathan Freiman, who has argued extensively in state and federal appellate courts. Others are former Supreme Court clerks and law professors, including Aaron Nielson of Brigham Young University law school, who was tapped by the court to argue as an amicus curiae.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]