If you add up all the time that Amazon warehouse worker Neal Heimbach spends waiting in the security line at the company’s Breinigsville, Pennsylvania, site, it equals thousands of minutes each year, Heimbach’s attorney told the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a case likely to determine whether Pennsylvania employees should be compensated for time spent going through on-site security screenings.

“Can it really be said that waiting in a security line in a hot warehouse after a long shift is not as valuable as the time of an executive,” Heimbach’s attorney, Pete Winebrake of Winebrake & Santillo, told the justices in Heimbach v. Amazon.com, arguing that even if his client only waits in line for a few minutes a day, it should still be compensated under the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]