While the true reasons behind the Sullivan & Cromwell layoffs are not known—the firm has not made any public comment regarding layoffs of around 50 staff members that were reported last week—the assumption from sources is that it was a business decision rooted in pandemic-fueled economics. But that might not be the full story. 

Sullivan & Cromwell ranks fourth in the Am Law 100 in profits per partner, is not leveraged and owns its own building. If a firm like that is jettisoning staff to save money, what does that mean for those who don’t enjoy the stability and resources of the white shoe, Wall Street giant? 

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]