Australian Government Inquiry to Examine Economic Impact of Litigation Funding and Class Actions
The results of the inquiry will be reported by December 7, the government said.
May 20, 2020 at 05:17 PM
3 minute read
An inquiry by Australia's Parliament into litigation funding and class actions will examine the impact of class actions on the economy and vulnerable businesses already suffering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The government's plan to launch the inquiry, dubbed Litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry, comes after calls by business leaders and business groups to regulate litigation funding and class actions amid claims businesses are being unfairly targeted.
According to the terms of reference, the inquiry will examine "whether the present level of regulation applying to Australia's growing class action industry is impacting fair and equitable outcomes for plaintiffs."
It will examine fees, costs and commissions earned by litigation funders and the impact of litigation funding on the damages and other compensation received by class members in class actions.
The financial and organizational relationship between funders and plaintiffs lawyers will also come under the microscope, "with a focus on whether these relationships have the capacity to impact on plaintiff lawyers' duties to their clients."
The inquiry, which will be run by lawmakers from a range of political parties, will also examine the effects of class actions on the economy and "the potential impact of Australia's current class action industry on vulnerable Australian business already suffering the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic."
The Victoria government is planning to allow lawyers in that state to take contingency fees and the inquiry will consider "whether this could lead to less financially viable outcomes for plaintiffs."
The inquiry by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services is to report by Dec. 7.
"Justice is not a business and the primary focus of those who work in the legal system should always be on getting the best outcomes for their clients, not on maximizing returns for hungry shareholders," Attorney-General Christian Porter said when he announced the date of the inquiry.
"I hope this inquiry will generate useful insights that will enable us to develop policies that will ensure the interests of Australians are better protected," he said.
Business groups want litigation funders to be regulated, arguing that class actions make it more difficult for businesses to operate.
"The inquiry needs to investigate the outrageous levels of returns that litigation funders (many of which are overseas firms) are receiving from class actions in Australia, to the detriment of plaintiffs, businesses and the broader community," Innes Willox, chief executive of the national employer association Ai Group, said in a statement.
"Litigation funders offer financial products to investors yet they are not subject to the regulations that apply to other providers of financial products. This is wrong and it needs to be addressed," Willox said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Trending Stories
- 1The Rise of AI-Generated Deepfakes: A New Cybersecurity Threat for Law Firms
- 2Litigation Leaders: Labaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Evaluation In-House
- 3Spoliation Sanctions
- 4At FDA, Flavored Vape Products Go Up In Smoke
- 5Arguing Class Actions: CAFA’s Local Controversy Exception
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250