IP Lawyers Eye Trials of COVID-19 Drug After 'Mad Scramble' for IP Deal
A typical intellectual property transaction licensing a drug to a producer might take four to six months. The deal for Emory University's potential treatment for COVID-19 took two weeks.
May 07, 2020 at 04:29 PM
5 minute read
Fritts, a veteran of intellectual property work at big law firms, oversees patent and license strategy and all IP matters at Emory University's office commercializing inventions developed by Emory researchers. In March, just as she had to shift her workspace from the campus to her kitchen table, she was focused on a discovery called EIDD-2801.
The research behind EIDD-2801 started in 2014 under federal defense contracts for a treatment against potentially weaponized encephalitis, but it evolved into an agent that could stop a broad range of viruses from reproducing. When the novel coronavirus started killing people in China in January, Emory's nonprofit biotechnology company, Drug Innovation Ventures at Emory, or DRIVE, identified EIDD-2801 as a potential treatment.
DRIVE wanted to sell a license to a Miami company, Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, which received plaudits for its work on an Ebola drug in 2018. If the license could be completed, Ridgeback would test the drug and, if successful, produce it for a desperate world market.
"I didn't want our office holding up the deal," Fritts said.
Neither did anyone else. "It became a mad scramble," said David Perryman, an IP lawyer who is DRIVE's chief operating officer. He suggested that the intellectual property work for a transaction like the Ridgeback license would typically take four to six months, but it was accomplished in two weeks.
Perryman credited the quick deal to an executive-to-executive negotiating process that started in the middle, "not the extremes," and fast, focused work by Fritts and her colleagues at Emory's Office of Technology Transfer, Eversheds Sutherland IP partner Peter Quittmeyer and patent lawyer Christopher Curfman of Meunier Carlin & Curfman.
The terms of the transaction weren't disclosed, but Fritts said to move this quickly, "There had to be a good bit of trust" between the parties, starting with their supposed "last best offer."
Ridgeback was represented by Judith Hasko of Latham & Watkins in Menlo Park, California. Through a firm spokeswoman, Hasko declined to discuss the deal.
Quittmeyer, the outside counsel, said he is used to clients moving very fast, but "there was definitely an urgency to this." He estimated that the parties had 90% of their issues agreed upon when negotiations started.
Moreover, he recalled a similar matter that went through 27 drafts of its contract. The Emory-Ridgeback deal had fewer than 10.
"Everyone knew you were talking about, potentially, lives" at stake, Quittmeyer said.
He added that Emory's technology transfer team, which had to work on a host of federal and university requirements, "really turned it around in miraculous time."
Curfman's role was to support DRIVE's deal team with information about global patent strategy, such as how one could file for patents in different countries and how those processes can be expedited.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readUS Fifth Circuit Departs From Sister Courts on Copyright Infringement Damages
4 minute readEx-Girardi Keese CFO Christopher Kamon, Shackled and Sniffing, Pleads Guilty
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250