Critical Mass: A Lawsuit to Block Bank of America's Limits on COVID-19 Loans Falls Flat. Class Actions Want More Universities to Pay Refunds.
Bank of America won a court challenge to the small business loan program in the $2 trillion COVID-19 stimulus package.
April 15, 2020 at 12:54 PM
6 minute read
Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly briefing for class action and mass tort attorneys. Bank of America won a court challenge to the small business loan program in the $2 trillion COVID-19 stimulus package. More class actions over refunds target universities such as Purdue. A new class action adds to a bulk of coronavirus cases against Princess Cruise Lines.
Feel free to reach out to me with your input. You can email me at [email protected], or follow me on Twitter: @abronstadlaw.
BofA Wins Ruling Over COVID-19 Small Biz Loans
In what could be the first judicial decision to interpret portions of the $2 trillion relief bill over COVID-19, a federal judge declined to grant a temporary restraining order that would have forced Bank of America to change its rules restricting which small businesses could apply for loans under the economic stimulus program.
A quick backgrounder: The CARES Act (which stands for Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act), passed on March 27, includes a $349 billion Paycheck Protection Program for small businesses. Filed on the day the program launched, a class action alleged Bank of America was unlawfully limiting its loan applicants to certain of its customers. Bank of America countered that the CARES Act did not forbid such restrictions, which it imposed to allow the program to run more efficiently.
At a Friday hearing, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher of the District of Maryland appeared skeptical about the plaintiffs' ability to bring the suit under the CARES Act. And this week, she declined to grant a temporary restraining order against Bank of America, noting she was reluctant to take action while so many details about the program remain uncertain.
Michael Dockterman (Steptoe & Johnson) told me that judges in civil cases so far have declined to grant emergency TRO motions amid the crisis unfolding around them over the coronavirus. For instance: one judge called an emergency filing last month over allegedly counterfeit unicorn drawings "insensitive," and another denied an emergency action in a case brought by Godfrey Johnson over the Paycheck Protection Program's details.
"I think everybody needs to be more careful now as to what they find is an emergency," Dockterman told me. "Don't tell me that it rises to a situation of life and death. We're dealing with life and death right now."
Universities Get a Rush of Refund Lawsuits
Universities are feeling the brunt of consumer class actions brought over closed campuses due to the coronavirus, with new lawsuits filed against Purdue University, the University of Miami and Jerry Fallwell's Liberty University in the past week. The suits all seek refunds, primarily for room and board fees, given that COVID-19 forced campuses to close their doors.
Arizona Board of Regents faced the first class action, brought last month by DiCello Levitt Gutzler.
Here's a summary of the new lawsuits:
>>Purdue University: Milberg Phillips Grossman, Cohen & Malad and Evangelista Worley filed a class action seeking pro rata refunds for room and board fees.
>>University of Miami: Anastopoulo Law Firm filed a class action alleging students should get refunds, because the closures resulted in a declining value of their education.
>>Liberty University: DiCello Levitt Gutzler, MichieHamlett and Matthew S. Miller LLC filed a class action against Liberty University seeking pro rata refunds.
Meanwhile, Southwest Airlines joined United Airlines in getting hit with a class action alleging it failed to provide refunds rather than credits for future flights. And Six Flags faces two class actions, filed by Bursor & Fisher and Khashayar Law Group, alleging it had continued to charge monthly and season ticket holders after closing its amusement parks on March 13.
Princess Cruise Lawsuits Crowned With Class Action
Princess Cruise Lines got hit with a class action last week alleging gross negligence in its handling of the quarantined Grand Princess, where 21 passengers and crew got coronavirus and two of them died. Lieff Cabraser and Mary Alexander & Associates filed the class action on behalf of more than 2,000 passengers of the voyage, which left San Francisco on Feb. 21 for Hawaii even though, according to the lawsuit, Princess Cruise Lines knew about COVID-19 on its ships.
Debi Chalik (Chalik & Chalik), whose firm has filed 16 individual lawsuits on behalf of Grand Princess passengers, was skeptical that a class action would succeed for claims of personal injuries and medical expenses, primarily because of the contract passengers agreed to when they purchased the cruise trip tickets. She said:
"In these cases, against Princess Cruise Lines, it has to be brought in the Central District of California in Los Angeles, in federal court. They've also specified in their contract they will not allow class actions. I stand to believe that every part of their passenger ticket contract will be held up in a court of law considering it always has been for every other reason. If they say you can't bring a class action, you can't bring a class action. That's what you agreed to as a passenger."
Here's what else is happening:
Grammar Gaffe? After helping Andrus Wagstaff increase its common benefit compensation in the pelvic mesh litigation, Blank Rome sued the firm over $500,000 in unpaid legal fees. Andrus Wagstaff insists Blank Rome is owed less than $200,000. Why the difference? In a new filing, Blank Rome claims it's a matter of punctuation in the contract—periods and bullet points, to be exact.
Suing Heroes: As more states issue executive orders or pass laws limiting liability for doctors and hospital staff on the front lines of the coronavirus pandemic, lawyers practicing in medical malpractice expect a slowdown in the filing of new cases. New York, New Jersey and Michigan have insisted on the legal protections, and Florida is considering similar measures. "A lot of people are thinking their practices are in danger," said New York plaintiffs' attorney John Hochfelder (The Law Firm of John M. Hochfelder). "You don't want to be the one suing heroes."
Equifax Sanctions: Objector lawyer Ted Frank (Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute) has filed a motion for sanctions against class counsel in the $1.4 billion Equifax settlement now before the Eleventh Circuit. Frank is one of several objectors appealing the settlement's approval by U.S. District Judge Thomas Thrash, of the Northern District of Georgia, who criticized them in his order earlier this year. Frank, in moving for sanctions, is fighting a $20,000 bond request from class counsel that he called "punitive," "abusive" and "harassing."
Thanks for reading Critical Mass! Stay safe, and I will be back next week.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250