A federal appeals court on Friday refused to stop a sweeping challenge to abortion regulations in Louisiana, but the ruling requires the plaintiffs to show why they believe they have a legal foundation to bring their claims in the first place.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s unsigned ruling rejected the state’s request for a writ of mandamus, a rare order that could have stopped the claims short before they’re fully aired. The case was closely watched, as a ruling in favor of Louisiana could have had broader implications across the Fifth Circuit. Lawyers for Texas and Mississippi supported Louisiana’s push to stop the federal litigation from proceeding.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]