Federal Prosecutors Charge 2 Men With Giuliani Ties in Campaign-Finance Violation Probe
According to the 21-page indictment, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman allegedly conspired to funnel foreign money to candidates for state and federal office in order to buy influence among lawmakers and governments in the United States.
October 10, 2019 at 11:01 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Two foreign-born men with ties to Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, have been indicted in Manhattan federal court on campaign-finance charges.
According to the 21-page indictment, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman allegedly conspired to funnel foreign money to candidates for state and federal office in order to buy influence among lawmakers and governments in the United States.
The pair concealed their scheme from candidates, campaigns and federal regulators by laundering money through bank accounts in the names of limited liability corporations and through the use of straw donors, according to the indictment.
Parnas, a Ukrainian-born businessman, and Fruman, who was born in Belarus, were charged along two other men in the four-count indictment in the Southern District of New York. They were expected to appear in federal court in Northern Virginia on Thursday.
Parnas and Fruman were former clients of Giuliani, the former New York City mayor who has come under fire recently for his role in alleged efforts by Trump to have the Ukrainian government interfere in the 2020 U.S. election.
Giuliani was not charged with any wrongdoing. The indictment, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, did not mention Giuliani or say he had any involvement in the alleged crimes.
The men, both American citizens, were arrested around 6 p.m. Wednesday evening at Dulles International Airport, with one-way tickets to board an international flight, Geoffrey Berman, U.S. attorney for the Southern District, said at a press conference Thursday.
Parnas and Fruman had been scheduled for depositions this week in connection with the House impeachment inquiry of Trump, though neither were expected to cooperate. On Thursday, House investigators subpoenaed both men for information related to the inquiry.
"Your clients' failure or refusal to comply with the subpoenas, including at the direction or behest of the president or the White House, shall constitute evidence of obstruction of the House's impeachment inquiry and may be used as an adverse inference against your clients and anyone with whom they are acting in concert," they warned in a letter to John Dowd, a former Trump attorney who is representing Parnas and Fruman.
Dowd did not return a call Thursday seeking comment on the case.
According to the indictment, Parnas and Furman in May 2018 made a $325,000 contribution to "Committee-1" in the name of Global Energy Producers, a Delaware LLC that was purportedly involved in the liquefied natural gas business. The donation, to the pro-Trump super PAC America First Action, initially sparked the suspicion of the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center, which filed a formal complaint with the Federal Election Commission last July.
Prosecutors said GEP was formed just around the time of the contribution and had no income or significant assets. Instead, they alleged, the money came from private lending transactions between Fruman and third parties and never passed through a GEP account. A similar donation of $15,000 was made to another unidentified committee around the same time, the indictment said.
According to the complaint, the "straw donor" scheme was designed to avoid federal reporting requirements, while advancing the political interests of Ukrainian government officials.
For instance, Parnas and Fruman met in mid-2018 with a then-sitting U.S. congressman, who had received $3 million in independent expenditures for America First Action during the 2018 election cycle, to ask for help in ousting the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, from her post.
Those efforts, the indictment said, "were conducted, at least in part, at the request of one or more Ukrainian government officials."
"They sought political influence, not only to advance their own financial interests, but to advance the political interests of at least one foreign official, a Ukrainian government official who sought the dismissal of the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine," Berman said in a brief statement.
The Wall Street Journal reported that the former congressman, identified in the media as ex-U.S. Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Texas, wrote to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo last year asking for Yovanovitch's removal. Trump moved to oust Yovanovitch in the spring, after Giuliani and his allies told the president that she was disloyal and obstructing efforts to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden over the dealings of his son, Hunter Biden, in Ukraine.
William F. Sweeney, assistant director-in-charge of the New York office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, said the investigation was aimed at protecting U.S. elections from foreign influence and exposing the true source of campaign contributions.
"These allegations are not about some technicality, a civil violation or an error on a form. This investigation is about corrupt behavior—deliberate lawbreaking," Sweeney said.
Two other men, David Correia and Andrey Kukushkin, were also charged in the indictment, as part of a separate scheme to make political donations that were secretly funded by a Russian businessman in order to win favor for a planned recreational marijuana business.
According to prosecutors, the plan involved meeting with candidates for state office in Nevada and donating between $1 million and $2 million to political committees in a "multi-state license strategy" to advance their business.
The indictment alleged that the defendants took steps to hide the backing of the business' foreign benefactor because of what Kukushkin called his "Russian roots and current paranoia about it." The plan, however, later faltered when the group missed the September 2018 deadline to apply for a recreational marijuana license in Nevada.
Kukushkin was arrested Wednesday in San Francisco, Sweeney said, and Correia remained at large Thursday afternoon.
Parnas and Fruman are charged with falsifying records and making false statements to the FEC. All four men are charged with conspiracy.
READ MORE:
Former Prosecutors Break Down Giuliani's Legal Problems Over Whistleblower Complaint
Giuliani Taps Former Watergate Prosecutor Jon Sale in Impeachment Probe
'Very Bad,' Gross Abuse,' 'Nothing Illegal.' What Lawyers Are Saying About the Trump-Ukraine Call
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readAttorney Sanctioned $9K for Revealing Nude Photos, Other Info in Court Filing
4 minute readChicago Cubs' IP Claim to Continue Against Wrigley View Rooftop, Judge Rules
2 minute readAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250