Atlanta Attorney Charged With Forging Judge's Name on Court Order
An attorney defending veteran criminal defense lawyer Elizabeth Vila Rogan said the indictment stems from "a misunderstanding" involving a municipal court judge.
June 18, 2019 at 05:11 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
A felony indictment charging an Atlanta criminal defense lawyer with forging a judge's name on a court order was based on the lawyer's belief that she had permission to sign for the judge, her defense attorney said Tuesday.
Elizabeth Vila Rogan was “merely attempting to clarify the status of a client's criminal history” with the filing of a three-sentence order that prompted the first-degree forgery charge now pending against her, said Rogan's attorney, Michael Moran.
“We believe the charge is predicated on a misunderstanding, a series of miscommunications,” Moran said. “The truth is that there has been absolutely no crime committed. Ms. Rogan has an impeccable record as a judge, prosecutor and defense attorney over 34-year career. … We look forward to the opportunity to address and resolve this misunderstanding.”
A Fulton County grand jury indicted Rogan on June 11 of one count of first-degree forgery. The indictment accuses Rogan of writing and presenting a court order on May 22 that included what was purported to be the signature of Roswell Municipal Court Judge Brian Hansford.
The indictment said that Hansford—who is also a partner at Miles Hansford & Tallant in Cumming—didn't authorize the signature.
The indictment stemmed from a complaint Roswell Municipal Court personnel made to Roswell police on May 22 regarding a “forgery incident,” according to the police report.
Hansford didn't respond to multiple attempts to contact him by phone and email. But he told Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard's staff that there was no misunderstanding or miscommunication underlying the initial criminal complaint to Roswell police, the DA's spokesman said.
Rogan was booked into the Fulton County Jail on June 12 and released the same day on a $10,000 signature bond, according to jail records.
Rogan has worked since 2017 at Michael Kennedy McIntyre & Associates, an Atlanta law firm that specializes in postconviction litigation. McIntyre couldn't be reached for comment.
Rogan served as a Fulton County magistrate judge from 2011-2012, and as an assistant Gwinnett County district attorney from 2016-2017, according to her LinkedIn page.
Rogan built her reputation in the 1990s as a criminal defense attorney with the Georgia Capital Defender Office, where she handled several of the office's high-profile death penalty cases. She repeatedly battled the imposition of the death penalty by calling out perceived disparities in sentencings in dozens of motions filed in death cases, according to news reports.
As a senior staff attorney for the Georgia Resource Center from 1990-1992, she handled appeals of 25 death penalty cases, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
In 2012, Rogan appeared as an expert witness in a landmark case brought by five Connecticut death row inmates challenging their sentences on grounds that minority defendants were more likely to receive a death penalty than white defendants, according to the Hartford Courant.
Rogan reviewed 25 years of Connecticut homicide prosecutions to identify cases eligible for the death, then provided her research to a Yale University professor who reviewed them for racial and geographic sentencing disparities.
Rogan earned her undergraduate degree from the University of Chicago in 1981 and her law degree from Columbia University School of Law in 1985. She worked with the Legal Aid Society in New York in its criminal appeals and criminal defense divisions before coming to Atlanta.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves 23andMe's $30M Data Breach Settlement - With Conditions
5 minute readOn Governor's Desk: NY 'Death Gamble' Bill That Seeks to Correct Pension Anomaly for Judges
'Serious Misconduct' From Monsanto Lawyer Prompts Mistrial in Chicago Roundup Case
3 minute readCleary vs. White & Case: NY Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Trending Stories
- 1Justices Will Weigh Constitutionality of Law Allowing Terror Victims to Sue PLO
- 2Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
- 3OpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
- 44th Circuit Allows State Felon Voting Ban Challenge to Go Forward
- 5Class Actions Claim Progressive Undervalues Totaled Cars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250