No Impunity for Online Rant, 5th Circuit Rules in Heterosexual's Reverse-Discrimination Suit
"Simply put, Title VII does not grant employees the right to make online rants about gender identity with impunity,” wrote Fifth Circuit Judge Catharina Haynes in a concurring opinion.
April 19, 2019 at 02:12 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has refused in a new ruling to expand federal workplace discrimination protections based on sexual orientation.
In the case, O'Daniel v. Industrial Service Solutions, the plaintiff Bonnie O'Daniel alleged she was discriminated against for being heterosexual, after she wrote a Facebook post about the propriety of a man wearing a dress in Target using a women's restroom or dressing room alongside her young daughters. One of her company's co-owners was part of the LGBT community, and took offense at the post and wanted to fire O'Daniel.
After a series of workplace disputes, O'Daniel in the end lost her job and then sued, alleging she was discriminated against for her sexual orientation of heterosexual, a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employers from discriminating against employees based on sex, race, color, national origin and religion. The district court dismissed the case for failing to state a claim under Title VII. O'Daniel appealed to the Fifth Circuit.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250