William Barr's Got the Mueller Report: What Happens Now?
AG William Barr said in a memo to Congress: "I am reviewing the report and anticipate that I may be in a position to advise you of the special counsel's principal conclusions as soon as this weekend."
March 22, 2019 at 05:28 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The special counsel, Robert Mueller III, sent a confidential report Friday to U.S. Attorney General William Barr on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, capping a nearly two-year probe that has cast a cloud over the Trump administration and secured the convictions of prominent figures on the president's campaign and in his orbit.
Barr now must decide how much, if anything, to make publicly available. The attorney general can expect enormous public pressure from congressional Democrats and other advocates to release the report in full.
“Let it come out—let people see it,” President Donald Trump said Wednesday at the White House.
Barr signaled during his Senate confirmation he would submit his own summary of Mueller's findings to Congress, rather than the special counsel office's original report, a move that would spark calls challenging the secrecy and likely spill into court. It is unclear how long Barr will take to submit his report to Congress.
Barr said in a letter to congressional leaders: “The special counsel has submitted to me today a 'confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions' he has reached.” He added: “I am reviewing the report and anticipate that I may be in a position to advise you of the special counsel's principal conclusions as soon as this weekend.”
Read Barr's memo to Congress:
|It was not immediately clear full scope of the report Mueller handed over to Barr. Barr said he would consult with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein about what information from the report can be released to Congress and the public “consistent with the law, including the special counsel regulations, and the department's long-standing practices and policies.”
“A concise Mueller report might act as a 'road map' to investigation for the Democratic House of Representatives—and it might also lead to further criminal investigation by other prosecutors,” Hogan Lovells partner Neal Katyal wrote in February in a piece at The New York Times. “A short Mueller report would mark the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end.”
Katyal should know: He helped draft the special counsel regulations in 1999.
The scope of Mueller's report might include a recommendation of whether prosecutors should indict, or declined to indict, Trump himself. Justice Department policy suggests a sitting president cannot be indicted, although legal scholars are disputing whether a department legal memo saying as much carries weight.
Mueller's investigation “has brought us to face similar questions of institutional integrity and transparency for the American public,” J.T. Smith II, formerly an executive assistant to Nixon-era Attorney General Elliot Richardson, said in a recent op-ed. “If Mr. Barr determines that Mr. Mueller's findings compel legal action, he should reconsider the policy against indictment of a sitting president.”
Rudy Giuliani and Jay Sekulow, lawyers representing Trump, said in a statement Friday: “We're pleased that the Office of Special Counsel has delivered its report to the attorney general pursuant to the regulations. Attorney General Barr will determine the appropriate next steps.”
What follows are three primary questions:
>> Will Barr release anything publicly from the report? We don't know, of course, but we do know what he has said about transparency. “For that reason, my goal will be to provide as much transparency as I can consistent with the law. I can assure you that, where judgments are to be made by me, I will make those judgments based solely on the law and will let no personal, political, or other improper interests influence my decision,” Barr said in prepared remarks for senators during his January confirmation hearing.
Barr did not commit to fully disclosing Mueller's final report to Congress or the public. But he told Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, that he plans to “make as much information available as I can consistent with the rules and regulations.”
>> Will the U.S. House move to subpoena Mueller's report, or even call the special counsel? There's some buzz about that possibility. “Well, we will obviously subpoena the report. We will bring Bob Mueller in to testify before Congress. We will take it to court if necessary,” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-California, said last month on the ABC News program “This Week.” “And in the end, I think the [Justice] Department understands they're going to have to make this public. I think Barr will ultimately understand that, as well.” New analysis from the Congressional Research Service said any move by a House committee to try to acquire the Mueller report “may face obstacles related to executive privilege and the rule of grand jury secrecy.” The U.S. House last week voted to urge the U.S. Justice Department to release Mueller's report.
>> What happens now to Mueller's prosecution team? Several members of the team have returned, or could return to their posts within the U.S. Justice Department.
One former member of the Mueller team, Brandon Van Grack, will now lead a specialized unit in the national security division focused on U.S. lobbying for foreign entities, The New York Times reported. Van Grack, a member of the prosecution team that won the conviction of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, had already left the Mueller squad and returned to the national security division.
Several cases brought by the Mueller team will, of course, continue past the close of the probe. That's because Mueller teamed up with assistant U.S. attorneys in Washington, including Michael Marando and Jonathan Kravis, both of whom are on the team prosecuting Trump confidante Roger Stone.
In a separate case against Russians accused of using online aliases to sow discord in the U.S. electorate, the prosecution team includes assistant U.S. attorneys Heather Alpino, Deborah Curtis and Jason McCullough, all members of the national security division at Main Justice.
Mueller, a former Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr partner, has given no hints about whether he'll return to his former firm. The special counsel's office includes three other former Wilmer lawyers: Jeannie Rhee, James Quarles and Aaron Zebley.
Greg Andres, the lead prosecutor in the Manafort case, was previously a partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell.
NPR reported recently that a lead member of Mueller's team, Andrew Weissmann, was preparing to step down. Weissmann jumped from a post at Main Justice to join Mueller's team. Weissmann, a former FBI general counsel and Jenner & Block partner, formerly taught at New York University School of Law.
Ex-White House Counsel Donald McGahn to Rejoin Jones Day
|Mike Scarcella and Ellis Kim contributed reporting from Washington.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Reaches Settlements With Two Companies on Claims of Selling Sensitive Location Data
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute read'That Decision was Wrong:' Federal Judge Rethinks Consumer Protection Class Certification
Trending Stories
- 1Atkins Likely to Bring Pro-Business, Light Regulatory Touch to SEC, Say Agency Observers
- 2The Boom Continues: These Firms All Opened New Florida Offices in 2024
- 3Conn. Appeals Court Slices $150 Million in Statutory Damages From Judgment Owed by Alex Jones
- 4Boies Schiller Flexner Adds Antitrust, Intellectual Property Partners
- 5Is AI Worth the Risks in Criminal Justice System?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250